{"id":6802,"date":"2024-05-29T12:15:43","date_gmt":"2024-05-29T12:15:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/localization.news\/uncategorized\/goog-enough-qualitat-nicht-nur-bei-der-maschinellen-ubersetzung-sondern-auch-bei-seo\/"},"modified":"2024-05-29T12:48:34","modified_gmt":"2024-05-29T12:48:34","slug":"goog-enough-qualitat-nicht-nur-bei-der-maschinellen-ubersetzung-sondern-auch-bei-seo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/localization.news\/de\/nachrichten-aus-der-industrie\/goog-enough-qualitat-nicht-nur-bei-der-maschinellen-ubersetzung-sondern-auch-bei-seo\/","title":{"rendered":"„Goog enough“-Qualit\u00e4t nicht nur bei der maschinellen \u00dcbersetzung, sondern auch bei SEO"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Google’s recently piloted AI Overview was supposed to revolutionize internet search after many years. So far, however, it seems to have only caused a flurry of jokes on social networks thanks to inaccurate, misleading and even dangerous answers. Even the new term „Goog enough“ has been coined as a paraphrase of the English expression for „good enough“, i.e. „good enough“. This term is also very well-known from localization. It is supposed to refer to the translation output quality in so-called „light postediting“, which was also discussed in SlatorPod by Jakub Absolon<\/a>. We seem to have another super-fast „Goog enough“ service on the Internet, but we cannot rely on it, as is the case with machine translation. The good old saying „good servant, bad master“ also seems to be true for the new Google AI Overview service.<\/p>\n\n

In our country (Slovakia), it is not yet possible to try the Google AI Overview service<\/a>, so let’s like some funny answers from Google AI Overview from foreign sources:<\/p>\n\n